Home > Help > Help - New AMD64 3500+ - XP Copys Files Slow.

Help - New AMD64 3500+ - XP Copys Files Slow.

Staff Online Now Cookiegal Administrator crjdriver Moderator etaf Moderator valis Moderator flavallee Trusted Advisor Macboatmaster Trusted Advisor Advertisement Tech Support Guy Home Forums > Software & Hardware > Hardware > Home I've felt it many times with this or that application, and MANY times with Windows. still not optimal but an improvement. I don't want to leave ubuntu because of that, it don't annoyed so much. check over here

I'm pretty sure the problem is not ubuntu, fedora or any other distro but it's certainly related with nvidia linux module vs windows driver on dual display. Really appalling. Something people have talked a lot about on this forum is that Metacity is slow and Nautilus is horribly slow. The problem is that it'll take the USB just once in a while, and that is causing me a big loss of time to make the tests and a headache. https://forums.techguy.org/threads/help-new-amd64-3500-xp-copys-files-slow.333455/

No matter what I did, after every boot the PC just hung after about 30 seconds. Well i just got my board in the other night and i had everything up and running and wasn't too satisfied with the OC on the memory scores i was getting A.

When you click on the corner of a window to drag it quite often doesn't pick it up. I am going to reboot a few more times and then run sisandra to test. Unfortunately the problem persists on another system with an ASUS M3A mobo when running Ubuntu Jaunty (9.04) AMD64m kernel 2.6.28-15. K8N Neo2 Platinum Athlon64 3500 (130 nm) 2G (4 x 512) SuperTalent PC3200 RAM 2 120G Maxtor SATA (1 & 2) in raid0 1 160G Seagate SATA (3) 1 Sony DRU

It actually takes over a second to register a tab. Password Site Map Posting Help Register Rules Today's Posts Search Site Map Home Forum Rules Members List Contact Us Community Links Pictures & Albums Members List Search Forums Show Threads CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=16514064, LBA=yes, LBAsects=268435455 IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:120,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120} PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4 DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 UDMA modes: udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 udma5 March 8th, 2009 | 9:02pmby Joanne Comments have been closed on this post to prevent spam.

Hope you track the bug(ger) down soon. I've had that too. I just can't see a hardware fault manifesting this way. I have to copy around 1Tb, and I'm expecting it to take 8 days!!!

he says he was running Ubuntu on an AMD64, so chances are he used the AMD64 install CD. https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/2697737/slow-performance-when-you-copy-files-to-a-file-server-from-a-virtual-machine-that-is-running-windows-xp-mode-on-a-windows-7-based-computer AstrophobosSeptember 27th, 2005, 02:35 PMI use ubuntu since october 2004 and I must admit that it fell slow for me too. Advertisement soDo Thread Starter Joined: Feb 22, 2005 Messages: 4 I'm at work right now.. As someone else said here.

I know. I understand your frustration. Any ideas? I found Ubuntu to be about as fast as XP (Of course, I have installed all kinds of needless stuff for Ubunmtu, like Firestarter, ClamAV, Nessuss, etc., etc., etc., which probably

I did it and it seemed like my computer was fine then. hdparm -Tt gives me reasonable speeds. anyway, only hdparm -tT give you real result. brentroosSeptember 26th, 2005, 11:40 PM* pmjSeptember 27th, 2005, 12:03 AMThe behavior he described, for example when using totem or when resizing windows, are not normal in Ubuntu, if things are working

With such a high post count as yours it is a surprise that you seem so uninformed about your own problem (that is, what is causing your problem). gammyhandSeptember 25th, 2005, 06:10 PMI have finally had enough. In anycase, do try it out first!

Who cares if the system can stay up indefinetly?

I disabled powersaving modes of these devices: PM ejecutable para dispositivo PCI Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset PCI Express Root Port 1 PM ejecutable para dispositivo PCI Intel Corporation 5 manickaSeptember 27th, 2005, 09:16 AMIn regards to what has made me want to leave ubuntu behind. Two disks were placed on a secondary SATA controller on the motherboard which I hadn't used before. It's played with half speed.

CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=16514064, LBA=yes, LBAsects=268435455 IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:240,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120} PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4 DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 UDMA modes: udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 udma5 We were wondering if this is still an issue? Mark as duplicate Convert to a question Link a related branch Link to CVE You are not directly subscribed to this bug's notifications. Dan: Can you check to see whether you are running by posting the output of uname -a dmesg | head ?

However, doing that is a lot of work (especially for a newbie) and when you're done it's not standard Ubuntu anymore. Other than that most boot delay problems are related to bad IDE (master/slave) configuration or cables . Thanks for any help or insight you can give.  I have spent hours looking over the forums and have learned much! Also note that this should be taken up with the FireFox devs, not the Ubuntu ones When you try and drag things around the desktop it's really sluggish as well.

Here is my workaround: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1264707/comments/18 . I had slip streamed an SP2 disk a few weeks before so I tried it. I always used large files, 250-350MB in size.